Skip to content
NOWCAST KOCO 4pm Weekday afternoon
Live Now
Advertisement

Supreme Court of Oklahoma hears arguments on gerrymandering petition

Supreme Court of Oklahoma hears arguments on gerrymandering petition
DILLON? REPORTER: THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT WAS BACK INSIDE OF THE STATE CAPITAL AFTER SOME RESTORATION TO THEIR HEARING ROOM. TODAY THEY HEARD THOSE ORAL ARGUMENTS BEFORE ACTIVISTS WILL BE ABLE TO GO TO THE SIGNATURE GATHERING STAGE. OUT THE CHALLENGE, ORDER CHANGES TO THE PETITION OR LET IT MOVE FORWARD. >> -- TODAY’S ORAL ARGUMENTS STREAMED LIVE AND IN FRONT OF A STANDING ROOM ONLY COURTROOM. IF PASSED, STATE 804 WOULD TAK THE POWER TO DRAW U.S. HOUSE AND STATE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS AWAY FROM STATE LAWMAKERS AND GIVE INSTEAD TO A NINE-PERSON COMMISSION, WITH 3 EACH OF REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS, AND INDEPENDENTS. ACTIVISTS SAY THE WAY IT WORKS NOW IS PART OF THE REASON FOR GOVERNMENT GRIDLOC >> IT’S BECAUSE POLITICIANS HAVE DRAWN DISTRICTS TO BE SO SAFE THAT THEY KNOW THEY’LL BE RE-ELECTED REGARDLESS OF HOW THEY VOTE UP HER AND WE DON’T THINK THAT’S THE WAY DEMOCRACY IS SUPPOSED TO WORK. REPORTER: TODAY THOSE CHALLENGING THE PETITION SAY THE -- SAY I IS TOO BROAD, IT WOULD VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND THAT THE SUMMARY ON THE FIRST PAGE LEAVES OUT KEY ISSUES. >> I REPRESENT THREE OKLAHOM CITIZENS WHO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROCESS IS FAIR, WANNA MAKES URE THE VOTERS ARE NOT EXPOSED TO LOGROLLING, WAN MAKE SURE THAT VOTERS WHO ARE EXPOSED TO THE PETITION GET A FAIR SHOT TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION. REPORTER:REPORTER: AGAIN, TODAY’ HEARING WAS NOT ABOUT WHETHER THE PETITION IS GOOD POLICY OR NOT. JUST ABOUT THE PROCESS SURROUNDING IT. WE DON’T KNOW WHEN THE SUPREME COURT WILL RULE ON THIS. IF THEY ALLOW THIS TO MOVE FORWARD, ACTIVISTS WOULD HAVE TOGETHER ALMOST 200,000 SIGNATURES BEFORE IT COULD END
Advertisement
Supreme Court of Oklahoma hears arguments on gerrymandering petition
A new state question that Oklahomans could soon get to vote on hopes to end gerrymandering in the Sooner State.Before the state question gets to the ballot, supporters have to get it through two challenges.The Supreme Court of Oklahoma heard arguments from people who challenge the question, which is about to go to the signature-gathering stage. If passed, State Question 804 would take the power to U.S. House and state legislative districts away from state lawmakers and give it to a nine-person commission comprised of three Republicans, three Democrats and three Independents.Activists said the way it works now is part of the reason for government gridlock."It's because politicians have drawn districts to be so safe that they know they'll be reelected regardless of how they vote up here," said Andy Moore, executive director of People Not Politicians. "We don't think that's the way democracy is supposed to work."People challenging the petition said the way it's worded is too broad, arguing it would violate the First Amendment and the summary on the first page leaves off key issues."I represent three Oklahoma citizens who want to make sure that the process is fair, want to make sure the voters are not exposed to logrolling, want to make sure that voters who are exposed to the petition get a fair shot to make an informed decision," attorney Robert McCampbell said. The hearing Tuesday was not on the petition itself nor on whether it's good policy, just on whether the petition can move forward how it's written. If the Supreme Court throws out the challenges, activists would have to gather nearly 200,000 signatures for it to appear on the ballot.

A new state question that Oklahomans could soon get to vote on hopes to end gerrymandering in the Sooner State.

Before the state question gets to the ballot, supporters have to get it through two challenges.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma heard arguments from people who challenge the question, which is about to go to the signature-gathering stage. If passed, State Question 804 would take the power to U.S. House and state legislative districts away from state lawmakers and give it to a nine-person commission comprised of three Republicans, three Democrats and three Independents.

Activists said the way it works now is part of the reason for government gridlock.

"It's because politicians have drawn districts to be so safe that they know they'll be reelected regardless of how they vote up here," said Andy Moore, executive director of People Not Politicians. "We don't think that's the way democracy is supposed to work."

People challenging the petition said the way it's worded is too broad, arguing it would violate the First Amendment and the summary on the first page leaves off key issues.

"I represent three Oklahoma citizens who want to make sure that the process is fair, want to make sure the voters are not exposed to logrolling, want to make sure that voters who are exposed to the petition get a fair shot to make an informed decision," attorney Robert McCampbell said.

The hearing Tuesday was not on the petition itself nor on whether it's good policy, just on whether the petition can move forward how it's written. If the Supreme Court throws out the challenges, activists would have to gather nearly 200,000 signatures for it to appear on the ballot.